Groups and Group Actions: Lecture 5

In which we find that the alternating group is a group, and study subgroups in more detail.

  • Theorem 15: (i) Any permutation in S_n can be written as a product of transpositions.  (ii) A permutation cannot be both even and odd.  We proved (i) by noting that since any permutation can be written as a product of disjoint cycles (Theorem 9), it suffices to show that any cycle can be written as a product of transpositions.  And we have (a_1 \, a_2 \, \dotsc \, a_k) = (a_1 \, a_2)(a_1 \, a_3)\dotsm (a_1 \, a_k).  For (ii), we showed that if \sigma can be written as a product of k transpositions, then \det(P_{\sigma}) = (-1)^k.
  • Definition of the alternating group A_n.
  • Proposition 16:
    1. A_n is a subgroup of S_n.
    2. For n \geq 2, the order of A_n is \frac{1}{2}n!.
    3. For n \geq 4, A_n is non-Abelian.

    Proving this was fairly straightforward.  To check the first part, we used our observation that \sigma is even if and only if \det(P_{\sigma})=1.  For the second part, we wrote down a bijection between A_n and S_n \setminus A_n.  And for the third part, we noted that (1 \, 2 \, 3) and (1 \, 2 \, 4) are even permutations that don’t commute.

  • Proposition 17 (Subgroup test): Let G be a group.  The subset H \subseteq G is a subgroup of G if and only if H is non-empty and h_1 h_2^{-1} \in H for all h_1, h_2 \in H.  We noted that if H is a subgroup then since it contains the identity it is non-empty, and since it contains inverses and is closed under the group operation we must have h_1 h_2^{-1} \in H whenever h_1, h_2 \in H.  For the reverse direction, we said that if h \in H then hh^{-1} = e \in H so H contains the identity, and then for any h_1 \in H we have eh_1^{-1} = h_1^{-1} \in H so Hcontains inverses.  Then for h_1, h_2 \in H, we have h_2^{-1} \in H and so h_1 (h_2^{-1})^{-1} = h_1 h_2 \in H, so H is closed under the group operation.
  • Proposition 18: Let G be a group.  Let H, K be subgroups of G.  Then H \cap K is a subgroup of G.  This is an exercise on Sheet 3.
  • Definition of the subgroup \langle S \rangle generated by a subset S of a group G.  Definition of the elements of S as the generators of \langle S \rangle.
  • Division algorithm: Let a, b be integers with b > 0.  Then there are unique integers q and r such that a = qb + r and 0 \leq r < b.
  • Proposition 19: Let G be a group.  Take g \in G.
    1. We have \langle g \rangle = \{g^k : k \in \mathbb{Z} \}.
    2. If g has finite order, then \langle g \rangle = \{e, g, g^2, \dotsc, g^{o(g)-1} \}.

    In each part, it was clear that \langle g \rangle contains the other set.  For the first part, we used the subgroup test to show that \{g^k : k \in \mathbb{Z}\} is a subgroup of G, and then since \langle g \rangle is the smallest subgroup containing g, we get equality.  For the second part, we used the division algorithm to show that any g^k (with k \in \mathbb{Z}) is in \{e, g, g^2, \dotsc, g^{o(g)-1}\}.

  • Theorem 20: Let G be a cyclic group.
    1. If G is finite, with |G| = n, then G is isomorphic to C_n.
    2. If G is infinite, then G is isomorphic to \mathbb{Z}.

    The first part was clear from our previous work. For the second part, we defined a map \theta : G \to \mathbb{Z} that sends g^k to k.  Checking that this is an isomorphism is an exercise.

Understanding today’s lecture

Theorem 15 doesn’t claim that the number of transpositions is well defined, just the parity of the number of transpositions.  If I can write a permutation as a product of 6 transpositions, then I may well be able to write it as a product of 8 transpositions (in fact, I can: write it as those six transpositions followed by (1 \, 2)(1 \, 2)).  But I’ll never be able to write it as a product of 7 transpositions, or 101.

Can you show that (1 \, 2 \, 3) and (1 \, 3 \, 2) are not conjugate in A_4?  Can you list the elements of A_5?  (Well, don’t list them, there are lots, but list the cycle types and say how many elements there are with each cycle type.)

Can you prove Proposition 18 (the intersection of two subgroups is a subgroup)?  Can you extend it to arbitrary intersections of subgroups (as mentioned in the remark following Proposition 18 in the lecture)?

In S_3, what is the subgroup \langle (1 \, 2 \, 3) \rangle?  What is the subgroup \langle (1 \, 2), (1\, 2 \, 3) \rangle?

Further reading

You might like to find a book and look up the classification of conjugacy classes in the alternating group: it turns out to be rather interesting.  We’ll see more about this later in the course.

On a completely separate note, do you ever wonder what current research is happening in group theory?  Here, for example, is a paper that has just appeared in the new journal Discrete Analysis, written by Sean Eberhard, an Oxford Mathematics graduate student.  I’ll find some more examples for future blog posts.

Preparation for Lecture 6

If G is a cyclic group and H is a subgroup of G, must H itself be cyclic?

We saw that C_2 \times C_2 is not cyclic.  Is C_m \times C_n ever cyclic?

We’re going to need to talk about equivalence relations soon, so this would be a good time to remind yourself what an equivalence relation is.  Do you have some favourite examples of equivalence relations?



2 Responses to “Groups and Group Actions: Lecture 5”

  1. Groups and Group Actions: Lecture 6 | Theorem of the week Says:

    […] Expositions of interesting mathematical results « Groups and Group Actions: Lecture 5 […]

  2. Groups and Group Actions: Lecture 10 | Theorem of the week Says:

    […] We proved this using the subgroup test. […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: