In which we explore reduced binary quadratic forms.
Archive for October, 2011
Number Theory: Lecture 11
October 31, 2011Number Theory: Lecture 10
October 28, 2011In which we develop our understanding of binary quadratic forms.
Number Theory: Lecture 9
October 26, 2011In which we prove quadratic reciprocity for the Jacobi symbol, and meet binary quadratic forms.
Number Theory: Lecture 8
October 24, 2011In which we prove the law of quadratic reciprocity and generalise the Legendre symbol.
Theorem 38: There is a primitive root modulo a prime
October 23, 2011This is something that I was lecturing on the other day. There I was talking to third-year Cambridge undergraduates, who know quite a bit of mathematics about groups and the like, and so I presented the topic accordingly. My challenge in this post is to describe some of the ideas in a way that assumes less technical background, since my aim is wherever possible to make these posts accessible to people who haven’t studied maths at university. I am going to assume that people know a small amount of modular arithmetic, but that’s OK because I’ve written about it previously.
So let’s begin with numerical examples, since one of the nice features of this sort of number theory is that one can get stuck in and try ideas explicitly quite easily (the objects we’re studying are, after all, just natural numbers).
Let’s work modulo 7 (for no particular reason, I just wanted a smallish prime). I’m interested in powers.
For example, modulo 7 the powers of 2 are 1, 2, 4, 1, 2, 4, … (dots because it seems to be repeating).
And the powers of 3 are 1, 3, 2, 6, 4, 5, 1, 3, … (oh, once I get back to 1, I can see that it will keep repeating).
And the powers of 4 are 1, 4, 2, 1, 4, ….
Powers of 5: 1, 5, 4, 6, 2, 3, 1, 5, ….
Powers of 6: 1, 6, 1, 6, … (interesting, I got back to 1 very quickly that time).
Lots of interesting things to explore there.
One observation is that we always seem to get back to 1 at some point. But we know from Fermat’s Little Theorem that this should be the case: we know that , so in this case we were bound to get back to 1 after 6 steps (if not sooner). In this post, I’d like to think about when we get back to 1. In the case of 6, we got back to 1 very quickly; in the case of 3 it took rather longer.
We have a name for this idea, this number of steps it takes to get back to 1. It’s called the order. Officially, the order of the element modulo
is the least positive integer
such that
. So the order of 2 modulo 7 is 3, and the order of 3 modulo 7 is 6.
If you know about Lagrange’s theorem about finite groups, then you’ll know that the order of an element divides the order of the group. In our case, we’re looking at the multiplicative group of non-zero integers modulo a prime , which has order
. So the order of
must divide
. (In the example above, you can check that the order of each element divides 6.) In this post, I want to concentrate on how many elements have order
, for each divisor
of
.
At this point you might like to go and try some more examples, to make some conjectures before you read on.
Number Theory: Lecture 7
October 21, 2011In which we continue our study of quadratic residues modulo primes.
Number Theory: Lecture 6
October 19, 2011In which we meet quadratic residues.
Number Theory: Lecture 5
October 17, 2011In which we study the multiplicative groups .
Number Theory: Lecture 4
October 14, 2011In which we study the multiplicative group .
Number Theory: Lecture 3
October 12, 2011In which we start to explore the structure of the multiplicative group .